Authority of the Constitutional Court MK
The constitutional court (mk) has 4 powers and 1 obligation as stipulated in the 1945 constitution. The constitutional court has the authority to try at the first. Therefore, And last levels whose decision is final for. Responded to this idea so that the 2001 annual session. Discussed the third amendment to the 1945 constitution. Therefore, Article 24b of the 1945 constitution clearly states that the. Judicial commission is a state institution that is independent and has the authority. To propose the appointment of supreme court justices. And has other powers in order to protect and uphold the honor, dignity and behavior of judges. In order to realize this, the government also formed a judicial. Commission selection committee and 7 people were elected. As members of the judicial commission for the 2005-2010 period.
Deciding disputes over the authority of state institutions whose powers are granted by the constitution
Obligations of the constitutional court. The constitutional court (mk) is required to render a decision on the opinion of the. House of representatives regarding Partners Email Lists alleged violations by the president and or vice president according to the constitution. The intended violation as stated and regulated in the provisions. Therefore, Of article 7a of the 1945 constitution is committing a violation of the law in the form of betrayal of the state. Corruption, bribery, other criminal acts, or disgraceful acts, and or no longer fulfills. The requirements as president and/or vice president as referred to in the 1945 constitution of the republic of indonesia.
Getting to know the judicial commission as a judicial institution in indonesia
The existence of the judicial commission (ky) is a new judicial institution in indonesia. Moreover, its formation was carried out when there was an amendment CRB directory to the 1945 constitution. Therefore, The birth of the judicial commission (ky) began in 1968, at that time the idea emerged about the establishment of a research advisory council for judges (mpph) which has the function to provide considerations in making final decisions regarding suggestions and or proposals relating to the appointment, promotion, transfer, dismissal, and action/penalty of the position of judges. However, this idea cannot be included in the law on judicial power. Therefore, After experiencing a long process, the mpr finally.